I graduated from Texas A&M with a BS in Nuclear Engineering back in 2004. I am so happy that these reactors are being planned in Texas. I have no doubts that Texas can lead the US if not the world in nuclear technology.
I wrote a letter to Rick Perry, the Governor of Texas, last year about the enourmous potential of Texas and nukes. I have not received a response. I think the return address having Ohio on it had a lot to do with that. In it I told him about the huge Uranium reserves near Goliad, the Gulf of Mexico being a good place for the plants for heat rejection and water desalination (fresh water is an important resource in Texas), and the high quality of engineering schools available to train the workforce needed to run these reactors. Texas A&M and The University of Texas both have research reactors for their engineering programs.
Another good thing is the geologic stability of Texas and it's central location. With work, I think Texas could build a better tie in to the other grids and export massive amounts of electricity to the east and west.
I have heard some crazy ideas such as a pure DC pipe on a superconductor to move this energy. The DC ,from what I am told, makes sense on superconductors because it uses the whole cross section of the conductor rather than just the skin of the conductor. I do not have a big background in electrical theory so can anyone who does, please post additional details about this and any corrections to any mistakes

.
I miss Texas so much during the winters in Ohio
