Why it's time to dispel the myths about nuclear power

[Marlin]

Why it's time to dispel the myths about nuclear power

https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2016/apr/11/time-dispel-myths-about-nuclear-power-chernobyl-fukushima

[Marlin]

Why it's time to dispel the myths about nuclear power

https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2016/apr/11/time-dispel-myths-about-nuclear-power-chernobyl-fukushima

This is from Nukeworkers news feed below. The struggle continues. 

http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/04/12/fukushima-five-years-after-health-researchers-turn-blind-eye-to-casualties/

[Bonds 25]

People read that sh*t and believe that horsesh*t.......

I don't see a difference between writing an article like counterpunch and standing up and yelling fire in a movie theater. The authors should be arrested and spend time in prison for public fearmongering.

[Rerun]

So much for free speech eh?

[Bonds 25]

Does free speech keep me from getting arrested for shouting "FIRE" in a crowded public establishment, causing mass hysteria and panic?

[Rerun]

Not the same try reading the Constitution and the papers of the founding fathers instead of babbling

[Bonds 25]

I have better things to do than read the constitution or argue with somebody who is ignorant enough to tell others Nuclear is more polluting than Fossil.

Fearmongering is real, wether its shouting fire or publishing false articles with the sole purposes of promoting anti-nuclear FUD......which sole purpose is to scare and frightened people.

[Rerun]

So you babble but have never read the Constitution?

[Chimera]

Yeah - read the constitution!  Don't you know that every American (and illegals, according to the Supreme Court) has the constitutional right to display their stupidity every chance they get?  And, no, I refuse to waste a sarcasm emoticon.

[Bonds 25]

So you babble but have never read the Constitution?

Well, thank God I don't give a flying rat fu*k what you think. You are a lier, a fearmongerer, a bully, a moron........and a d*****bag.


Modified for language  NN

[hamsamich]

According to some of the old cases I looked up on the Net, the "yelling fire" offense has to have three things intact to be considered criminally injuring -   imminence, intent, and likelihood of action.

Schenck v. United States, and later - Brandenburg v. Ohio.  Not that I agree with the article at all, but mere advocacy of something "injuring" isn't enough.  False statements on the other hand is a different ballgame.  It actually depends on who said it and who it was said about.  Since Nuclear Power in general isn't really an entity, it would be hard to lock these idiots up.  What a shame. 

This all assumes that the supreme court correctly interpreted the first amendment.  The amendment itself doesn't provide specific examples so telling someone to go read the constitution is kind of silly.  What matters is how it is interpreted.

[Rerun]

So the Constitution is silly?

[Nuclear NASCAR]

So the Constitution is silly?

This little discourse would be better handled through PM's to each other than in the open forums.  Thanks for understanding and for y'alls cooperation.   

[Rennhack]

And off topic.

[GLW]

pay to play,...