Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker Menu

Can California Cut Its Carbon Without Nuclear? Doubtful

Started by News Team, Jul 03, 2016, 06:00

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

News Team

Can California Cut Its Carbon Without Nuclear? Doubtful

Pacific Gas & Electric Co.’s proposed agreement with several labor and environmental groups to cease operations of its Diablo Canyon Power Plant in central California after 2025 aims to replace the plant’s carbon-free electricity with a mix of renewables, energy efficiency and energy storage. Analysis of the effects of recently shutdown nuclear reactors points to the riskiness of using this strategy to meet California’s stringent carbon-cutting mandates. 

Source: Can California Cut Its Carbon Without Nuclear? Doubtful

GLW

they've got nine years to get there so we'll see,...

I really do not expect a private company to expend as much effort as PG&E  "promised" in this endeavour,...

perhaps a bit of "good faith and peppercorn" showmanship,...

it's really not PG&E's business or their shareholder's to carry the burden without recompense,...

I suspect a future demand from PG&E for state and/or federal subsidies, or else,...

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2025 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?