NASA Likely to Break Radiation Rules to Go to Mars

Started by Marlin, Apr 27, 2017, 10:54

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Marlin


Bonds 25

So, NASA can figure out how to put humans on Mars.....but they can't figure out that 50 REM of exposure over a year will have very little....if any effects at all on the health of the Astronauts. Dumb smart people.
"But I Dont Wanna Be A Pirate" - Jerry Seinfeld

Chimera


SloGlo

Quote from: Chimera on Apr 28, 2017, 07:39
Planned Special Exposure?

ya wood think, huh? probly the smallest aspect two bee planned fore this project. unless, of coarse, radiation effects sells differently inn space.
quando omni flunkus moritati

dubble eye, dubble yew, dubble aye!

dew the best ya kin, wit watt ya have, ware yinze are!

Red Gold

Quote from: Bonds 25 on Apr 27, 2017, 09:45
So, NASA can figure out how to put humans on Mars.....but they can't figure out that 50 REM of exposure over a year will have very little....if any effects at all on the health of the Astronauts. Dumb smart people.
I think they know that. But the issue is really PR-related more than anything else. NASA has to be seen to be Doing Something.

SloGlo

Quote from: Red Gold on Apr 28, 2017, 10:36
I think they know that. But the issue is really PR-related more than anything else. NASA has to be seen to be Doing Something.
butt there studying global warming!
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2010-02-01-nasa-moon-obama_n.htm
quando omni flunkus moritati

dubble eye, dubble yew, dubble aye!

dew the best ya kin, wit watt ya have, ware yinze are!

a|F

Quote from: Bonds 25 on Apr 27, 2017, 09:45
So, NASA can figure out how to put humans on Mars.....but they can't figure out that 50 REM of exposure over a year will have very little....if any effects at all on the health of the Astronauts. Dumb smart people.

Did we read the same article?

It's too bad they don't have you on the team to figure this all out for them/us/Planet B.

Bonds 25

Quote from: a|F on Apr 28, 2017, 01:52
Did we read the same article?

It's too bad they don't have you on the team to figure this all out for them/us/Planet B.

"NASA's biggest obstacle to sending humans to Mars may not be related to line items in budgets, but to the safety of the astronauts themselves"

"Space radiation presents the tallest hurdle to NASA's future travel plans that extend beyond low-Earth orbit and for periods longer than a year. On the International Space Station, astronauts are bombarded with 10 times as much radiation as they experience on Earth in a given period; on Mars, they will encounter 100 times the terrestrial dose"


~500 mrem annual exposure from background that is experienced here on Earth........100 times 500 mrem is, I believe unless my calculator is off, 50 Rem of exposure annually. The Astronauts receiving 50 Rem over a year could literally be the least dangerous aspect of traveling to Mars.

Am I hired?
"But I Dont Wanna Be A Pirate" - Jerry Seinfeld