Michigan House advances nuclear feasibility study bill
https://www.thecentersquare.com/michigan/michigan-house-advances-nuclear-feasibility-study-bill/article_20eedc84-daad-11ec-a16a-538e319b3b7f.html
After posting I thought about a "study", having worked at several DOE facilities it does not necessarily have a positive connotation. A study or meeting about a subject that has already extensively explored defuses personal responsibility spreads blame around if the subject fails, goes over budget, or in general loses favor. Yes, I am generalizing and there are benefits to each like allowing ineffective people to participate in an important process and break up the day. How many studies are needed in a field that has been studied to death? How many people are laterally promoted because it is too hard to fire people in a large bureaucracy who show up at these meetings or head a study.
Yes, I have a burr under my saddle having worked hard money contracts on DOE sites and had to deal with some of this BS.
Ok Rant over. "I feel much better now"
Buddy from Night Court ![[coffee]](//www.nukeworker.com/forum/Smileys/new/coffe.gif "Coffee")
