ACAD 10-001 Question

[Creeker]

I have a question relating to figure 2-2 of ACAD 10-001.

Specifically, the block labeled "Does candidate have 2 years or more in a position equivalent to reactor operator position at a military reactor?"  The exact circumstance is a non-ET operator with less than 2 years onboard ship as an EWS, or PPWS.  The follow on command was a non-prototype duty, followed by EAOS. 

Now, in the INPO document "ACAD 10-001, Guidelines for Initial Training and Qualification of Licensed Operators Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)", there is a question which deals with "Total Military Nuclear Experience" which states that an NEC is good from issue to removal, so throughout career transitions to non-nuclear billets, training commands, etc, the "Total Military Nuclear Experience" continues to accumulate, but I'm not so sure I can use this guidance on the "equivalent to RO operator position" requirement.

Can I get some guidance on how other utilities count EWS/PPWS/PPWO time?

Thanks very much in advance!

[Higgs]

Two years of actually standing the watch. If they do not have that, they won't be eligible. Like it says, "in the position of..."

Justin

[Higgs]

By the way, look at the definition section as well.

Justin

[Creeker]

"In the position of.." is how I read it. 

What are you referring to in the definitions?

[Higgs]

The defenition of total military nuclear experience. Also note that that term is used in flow chart 2-1, not on 2-2. You're reading it correct, no interpretation necessary. They use total experience for determining direct ro eligibility.

Justin

[Creeker]

Thanks, Justin. 

I read it like you do.

Bill

[Higgs]

You're welcome!

Justin

[Creeker]

Any other opinions to support or oppose?