Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker Menu

How would you fix the NNPP

Started by Preciousblue1965, May 07, 2008, 12:17

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

drayer54

Quote from: eaton1981 on Sep 06, 2012, 09:07
Does a gas turbine tech do any type of "hands on training" at a land based mockup of a gas turbine before they are shipped out to the fleet? I doubt it.

In my opinion, the NPTUs can be done away with.

Does NR view the prototypes to have any purpose beyond training? Equipment testing? Procedure implementation? Research?

USC doesn't play ECU until Saturday, so perhaps a NR type who wanders one of these facilities would have some insight?

eaton1981

KAPL uses them for testing and research. I believe Bechtel or Lockheed or whatever corp. is in charge nowadays of the Kesselring Site actually OWNS the S8G and MARF plants.

Still though...I learned a lot more actually shifting the EP on my boat then I ever did as a student at NPTU. Maybe there's a TINY bit of merit of sending kids through to see how quals work. Still though...that's a lot of cash just to teach them how to ask "Do you have time for a checkout?"

GLW

Quote from: eaton1981 on Sep 09, 2012, 04:55
KAPL uses them for testing and research......

And they don't need Navy enlisteds to perform that function,...

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"

NukeLDO

Quote from: eaton1981 on Sep 09, 2012, 04:55
KAPL uses them for testing and research. I believe Bechtel or Lockheed or whatever corp. is in charge nowadays of the Kesselring Site actually OWNS the S8G and MARF plants.

Nope.  DOE still owns the plants.  KAPL (now combined with Bechtel Propulsion Machinery Corporation) is contracted to run the facility and operations of the plants.  On the opposite end of the spectrum, at the MTS, the contractor runs student training, and the Navy is responsible for operation of the plants.
Once in while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right

GLW

Quote from: Drayer on Sep 05, 2012, 08:58

...The fleet doesn't remove people based on their learning or operating ability....


Based on numerous empirical observations I beg to differ,...

here's the latest;

Quote from: Aninsomniac on Sep 19, 2012, 05:54
Thanks. BNEQ is a whole different story and water under the bridge so to speak, it came to a bird, with all due respect to him, not trusting me with being an operator. To be more specific: I don't know why I can draw BFPL but not list every single exact coordinate the graph changes, but blow every thing else out the water.

Before the Navy I have a decent background in low voltage electronics, which helped me a lot going through the pipeline, when it came to BE, Digital, and... that last A-school class everyone hated: ICE. Yeah I remember feeling like I already knew it our grasped it fast. But to answer your question I'd rather fix broken electronics to actual operating. Being an ET I'm good with computers; building, operating, fixing, all that, whatever an ET would do in a civilian plant. I imagine there's several different jobs in a civilian plant that an ET would do on a boat.

Prototype should have weeded out book smart, hands stupid before the fleet wasted 18 months plus on this billet. If the fleet has to do this job, p-type is a redundant, paid vacation for staff and students alike (IMNSHO). As a taxpayer, my inclination is that perhaps it's time to staunch the fiscal bleeding.

Quote from: Drayer on Sep 05, 2012, 08:58
....Nukes can go straight to sea from power school, but I think the qual process would need to be modified to merge the mechanical/electrical/reactor operator basics of power plant operation and the demands of a real warship. It could be done for sure. Why not?

agreed,...

(sic)

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"

drayer54

Quote from: GLW on Sep 20, 2012, 10:38
Prototype should have weeded out book smart, hands stupid before the fleet wasted 18 months plus on this billet. If the fleet has to do this job, p-type is a redundant, paid vacation for staff and students alike (IMNSHO). As a taxpayer, my inclination is that perhaps it's time to staunch the fiscal bleeding.
1) p-type is never a vacation.

2) BNEQ!!!! No, no, no....... Ive seen people who can't operate a rack light or a commode without a babysitter pass BNEQ. Somebody had to have been super special to get weeded out here. Finding the 95k ton chunk of steel was harder than BNEQ.

GLW

Quote from: Drayer on Sep 20, 2012, 05:09
1) p-type is never a vacation.

it was for me, right at the top of my favorite Navy duty stations,...

rotating shift,...one's and three's and five's off,...

paid twice a month,...

living 17 minutes from the front gate,...

allowed to live like an adult on the local economy, take care of your business and we will not mind it for you, show up on time, do what's expected on shift, go home on-time,..

four real seasons,...

great scenery and local stuff to do,...

easy, peasy, lemon squeezy good times,...

perhaps things have changed,... :-\

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"

Gamecock

Quote from: GLW on Sep 20, 2012, 10:38

Prototype should have weeded out book smart, hands stupid before the fleet wasted 18 months plus on this billet. If the fleet has to do this job, p-type is a redundant, paid vacation for staff and students alike

Its not a vacation for anyone to  keep an aging reactor plant operational.

This time, I have to disagree with you.
"If the thought police come... we will meet them at the door, respectfully, unflinchingly, willing to die... holding a copy of the sacred Scriptures in one hand and the US Constitution in the other."

GLW

Quote from: Gamecock on Sep 20, 2012, 09:07
Its not a vacation for anyone to  keep an aging reactor plant operational.

This time, I have to disagree with you.

ah well, there is that,....

my doctor says something similar every time I walk through his door,... 8)

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"

HydroDave63

Quote from: Gamecock on Sep 20, 2012, 09:07
Its not a vacation for anyone to  keep an aging reactor plant operational.

This time, I have to disagree with you.

What say you to the notion of having the nubs feel the steam and smell the phosphates with the BTs in Great Mistakes for 8 weeks, then off to Simulators sans reactors at Goose Creek?

GLW

Quote from: HydroDave63 on Sep 20, 2012, 09:33
What say you to the notion of having the nubs feel the steam and smell the phosphates with the BTs in Great Mistakes for 8 weeks, then off to Simulators sans reactors at Goose Creek?

I say I don't believe they have BTs anymore,...

then again,...they don't have a lot of things anymore,...

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"

HydroDave63

Quote from: GLW on Sep 22, 2012, 07:28
I say I don't believe they have BTs anymore,...

then again,...they don't have a lot of things anymore,...

Ok......

For the cost of a couple hundred washouts , we could set up some donkey boilers, a 600# steam plant, a small TG set and a main engine/water brake system.

GLW

Quote from: HydroDave63 on Sep 22, 2012, 10:17
Ok......

For the cost of a couple hundred washouts , we could set up some donkey boilers, a 600# steam plant, a small TG set and a main engine/water brake system.

that would be a MTS,... 8)

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"

HydroDave63

Quote from: GLW on Sep 22, 2012, 02:58
that would be a MTS,... 8)

Indeed it would. And if I was ever SecNav, it would be the power source to a refurbished LORAN station, far from the temptations of drunk driving, chasing Skiddie Kiddies, DITY move scams etc.

Gamecock

"If the thought police come... we will meet them at the door, respectfully, unflinchingly, willing to die... holding a copy of the sacred Scriptures in one hand and the US Constitution in the other."


GLW

Quote from: Drayer on Nov 03, 2012, 07:27
So you think it's broke?

Aaaaaaaaaaand they're off!!!

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"

HydroDave63

Quote from: Gamecock on Nov 03, 2012, 07:19

I wonder if he'll fix it?

http://www.navy.mil/navydata/bios/navybio.asp?bioID=440

Any skipper that could successfully drive and park the 683 with its......unique camber and....special handling during dives...has my vote!!  :P

rlbinc

Quote from: GLW on Jul 12, 2012, 12:25

So, if you're a sailor in the NNPP, succeeding due to ADM Bowman's sentiment, you might want to consider staying in the USN, as the attrition rate for former sailors in license class is observably (if not empirically) higher than it used to be,...

of course, I could be wrong,...

You're not wrong.
We have replaced a formerly high Navy Nuclear Power training attrition rate with low Initial License Training throughput.
That 30 to 50% filter will catch the SMAGs, since the Navy opened the filter bypass, we backflush them out here.

Higgs

Quote from: rlbinc on Nov 05, 2012, 03:08
You're not wrong.
We have replaced a formerly high Navy Nuclear Power training attrition rate with low Initial License Training throughput.
That 30 to 50% filter will catch the SMAGs, since the Navy opened the filter bypass, we backflush them out here.

I agree. 30% of my most recent class dropped, 75% of the drops were Navy nukes.

Justin
"How feeble is the mindset to accept defenselessness. How unnatural. How cheap. How cowardly. How pathetic." - Ted Nugent

dmcgn37

Sorry I just found this funny as an old cruiser sailor....we were happy when we had five and dimes ;)

"Also, if they don't have the man power, they will just shorten the watch rotation and duty sections. 5-10's and 3 section duty on a carrier... "

HydroDave63

Quote from: dmcgn37 on Mar 28, 2013, 07:55
Sorry I just found this funny as an old cruiser sailor....we were happy when we had five and dimes ;)


Or when those POS distilling units would go OOS, then port-n-starboards!  >:(

spekkio

Been away for a bit but I find it quite comical that after 26 pages the consensus reached one of two conclusions:

1) It's not broke OR
2) Raise the pay.

The Navy has done #2 many times. People are still leaving at a similar rate (lower now thanks to a poor economy). Any more bright ideas?

dad

Quote from: eaton1981 on Sep 06, 2012, 09:07
Does a gas turbine tech do any type of "hands on training" at a land based mockup of a gas turbine before they are shipped out to the fleet? I doubt it.

In my opinion, the NPTUs can be done away with.


My son graduated from the GC  NPTU in the last few months.

There are certainly issues with keeping even one of the 60 50 year old MTS up and available for training.

He qaulified several weeks before graduation and volunteered each day to work with members on his crew who had not yet qualified ( on days when finding make work for him to do was a challenge - which was every day he did not have watch ).

Apparently the standards were relaxed in the last week or two so that virtually everyone who had not given up previously was able to qualify.

Failure and self removal were apparently the same thing.  Those who wanted out went to medical and reported depression or some other disqualifying condition.

However, IMHO, the above are all things that a competent organization can fix by policy changes, training  and/or training facility  investments.

I was able to observe my son first hand multiple times through out the Nuke pipeline.  He came home for emergency leave for a terminal illness in A school, T-Track Leave, Christmas holiday in Power School, Pre-Fill Leave, emergency leave for a funeral during the first few months of Prototype, and  a 30 day leave before reporting to his boat. ( The member of the Greatest Generation who was supposed to die a few weeks after A School  started,  instead lived a relatively healthy life for another year and half ).

The difference in this Sailor between the Pre-Fill leave, and the 30 day leave after prototype graduation was dramatic.  The self driven check out process without hand holding, the requirement for this unmarried sailor to live outside the barracks, take care of himself, and qualify with feedback which was often non-existent except when it was negative, and the ability to interact with veteran Nukes and pick and choose from conflicting career advice, made him decisive and unflappable.

In this one case at least, the Sailor who recently reported to his boat while underway,  somewhere in the Pacific,  was much different than he would have been had he gone straight from the Military Technical Training School environment of NNPTC to his boat.  

Just one father's opininion.     A father who went from his own technical training school directly to his first command thirty forty years ago without anywhere near that amount of seasoning or maturity.  Take it for what it is worth.





Gamecock

Quote from: NF Dad on May 15, 2013, 09:00


Apparently the standards were relaxed in the last week or two so that virtually everyone who had not given up previously was able to qualify.

Failure and self removal were apparently the same thing.  Those who wanted out went to medical and reported depression or some other disqualifying condition.


The quoted portion from your post is not factual.

Cheers,

GC
"If the thought police come... we will meet them at the door, respectfully, unflinchingly, willing to die... holding a copy of the sacred Scriptures in one hand and the US Constitution in the other."


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2025 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?