NukeWorker Menu

Farley 2 - Status & History

Comprehensive reactor performance metrics, cycle analysis, and historical outage data.

?
Composite Operational Excellence Score (0-100) — average percentile rank across 7 dimensions in three sub-scores: Reliability (capacity factor, forced outage days, B2B avg streak), Efficiency (fuel utilization, refuel duration), and Discipline (startup duration, scram count). 5-year window. Higher = more operationally excellent. Click to see the full breakdown.
37
Excellence
#69 of 94 ↑4
Mid Quartile
?
Days of continuous operation since the last outage ended. Clean run (no forced outages since last refueling).
315
Current Run
days ✔
?
Longest recorded period of continuous operation between outages (2004-04-15 to 2005-10-15).
548
Record Run
days
?
Breaker-to-Breaker runs — continuous operation exceeding the cycle-adjusted threshold (410 days for this 18-month cycle unit) with no trips to 0% power.
7
B2B Runs
76% toward B2B (311/410d)
?
Lifetime capacity factor: average power level across all recorded days (100% = always at full power).
90.7%
Capacity Factor
?
Total number of scheduled refueling outages detected in the historical data.
18
Outages
since 1999
?
Average time from first power generation (>0%) to sustained full power (≥95% for 2+ days) across the last 3 scheduled outages. Click to compare against the fleet on the Operator Efficiency Leaderboard.
5.7
Avg Startup
days (last 3)
?
Average fuel utilization — percent of the designed fuel cycle that this unit consumes before refueling, derived from the historical burn-down trajectory. Higher = more efficient operator (refuels with less margin remaining; closer to coastdown). Computed as 100% minus the unit's average refuel-point fuel %, using the last 3 years where available, otherwise lifetime average. Click to compare against the fleet on the Operator Efficiency Leaderboard.
94.3%
Fuel Utilization
3yr avg
?
NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score is a composite 0–100 ranking of every active US nuclear unit across 7 publicly observable performance metrics, grouped into three sub-scores:
Reliability — capacity factor, forced outage days, B2B avg streak
Efficiency — fuel utilization, refuel duration
Discipline — startup duration, scram count
Each unit's metric is converted to a percentile across the active fleet. Sub-score = average of its components; composite = average of the three sub-scores. Use the time-window toggle below to switch between 3yr / 5yr / lifetime.
Time window — change how far back we look
NukeWorker's
Operational
Excellence Score
37/100
Mid Quartile · #69/94
5-year window

Farley 2 ranks #69 of 94 active US units on NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score over the 5-year window. Strongest area: Forced Outage Days/yr (54th percentile). Weakest: Scrams (5-year) (16th percentile).

Reliability
44
Capacity factor + Forced outages + B2B streaks
Efficiency
44
Fuel utilization + Refuel duration
Discipline
23
Startup duration + Scram count
Cohort Rankings apples-to-apples comparison within each peer group
Reactor type: #48 of 61 PWR
Containment: #40 of 48 Dry Ambient (PWR)
Cycle length: #40 of 54 18-month cycle
Fleet rank above (69 of 94) compares all active US units; cohort ranks compare only against units sharing this property.
Per-dimension breakdown (7 metrics)
Capacity Factor 54th
92.1% (higher better, Reliability)
Forced Outage Days/yr 54th
3.4d (lower better, Reliability)
B2B Avg Streak 24th
503d (higher better, Reliability)
Fuel Utilization 53th
98.1% (higher better, Efficiency)
Refuel Duration 35th
35d (lower better, Efficiency)
Startup Duration 31th
5.6d (lower better, Discipline)
Scrams (5-year) 16th
0.8/yr (lower better, Discipline)

Each dimension's percentile is computed across the active US fleet (94 units with sufficient history). Sub-score = average of its component percentiles. Composite = average of the three sub-scores. 5-year window. View full leaderboard →

Methodology

NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score is a composite ranking that combines 7 publicly observable performance metrics into a single 0-100 number per US nuclear unit.

How it's computed: Each unit's raw value is converted to a percentile (0-100) within the 94 active US units that have at least 2 completed refueling cycles. The 7 percentiles are averaged into 3 sub-scores (Reliability, Efficiency, Discipline), and those are averaged into the final composite.

Active window — 5-year:

  • Reliability — Capacity factor (5yr), forced outage days/yr (5yr), B2B avg streak (lifetime)
  • Efficiency — in-cycle fuel utilization (3yr), median refuel duration (5yr)
  • Discipline — robust mean startup duration, scrams/yr (5yr, annualised)

Cohort rankings: alongside the fleet rank, each unit gets ranked within its reactor type (PWR/BWR), containment design (Ice Condenser, Mark I, etc.), and cycle length (12/18/24-month). Useful for apples-to-apples comparisons.

What's excluded: subjective community ratings, confidential INPO ratings, financial metrics. We only use publicly available NRC + cycle data.

Why three windows? 5yr (default) is the industry standard. 3yr captures recent operational changes and post-pandemic recovery. Lifetime gives newer units a fair comparison and reveals long-term consistency.

Edge cases: units with fewer than 2 cycles (e.g., Vogtle 4) show "Provisional". Decommissioned units excluded.

Refresh cadence: recomputed daily. Each window cached separately.

A data-derived proxy for operational performance; not affiliated with INPO. INPO ratings are confidential and qualitative — ours is public and quantitative.

5-yr trend: 2021: 65/100 (#27/93)2022: 72/100 (#19/92)2023: 47/100 (#49/92)2024: 48/100 (#49/93)2025: 29/100 (#80/94)2026: 32/100 (#76/94) ↑ +2.7 pts vs 2025
Compare Farley 2 head-to-head with up to 3 other units. Compare now
?
Duration of each outage in days, shown chronologically. Green bars are scheduled refueling outages, red bars are forced/unscheduled. The orange dashed line marks the average duration. Extended outages (>180 days) and D&D periods are excluded.

Outage Duration Trend

?
Days between consecutive scheduled refueling outage starts, showing operating cycle regularity. The purple dashed line marks the average cycle length. Most U.S. reactors operate on 18-month (547 day) or 24-month (730 day) cycles.

Cycle Length History

?
Time in days from first power generation (>0%) to sustained full power (≥95% for 2+ consecutive days) after each scheduled refueling outage. The dashed line marks the average. Includes startup testing holds and power dips.

Startup Duration Trend

?
Estimated fuel remaining in the current cycle, expressed as a percentage of the unit's typical cycle. Starts at 100% when the unit returns to power post-refuel and drops as full-power-days are burned. Days at reduced power burn fuel proportionally — so a unit with significant downtime (high burn deficit) drops slower and ends up with MORE fuel left than its calendar position would suggest. Coastdown threshold around 15%. Toggle to overlay past cycles on a normalized "days into cycle" axis to see how aggressively this unit historically burns down before refuel.

Fuel Burn Down Cycle since Jun 11, 2025

36.6% remaining 331 / 510 days 7.8 FPD margin
Avg refuel: 2.9% Avg refuel (3yr): 5.7% Deepest burn: 0.0% (2004-04 → 2005-10) Most margin: 16.3% (1999-12 → 2001-02)
?
Monthly capacity factor with outage events overlaid as red bands. Green bars show average power level per month. Toggle to Daily view for raw daily data.

Power History

Scram # 57789
2025-06-28 2025-06-29 2 6d - -
Scram # 57769
2025-06-20 2025-06-22 3 11d - -
Scheduled SGR/Major
2025-03-17 2025-06-09 85 394d 2025-04-05 -19d
Scram # 56971
2024-02-16 2024-02-17 2 93d - -
Scram # 56852
2023-11-15 2023-11-15 1 2d - -
Scheduled
2023-10-09 2023-11-13 36 112d 2023-10-08 +1d
Unscheduled
2023-06-14 2023-06-19 6 408d - -
Scheduled
2022-04-11 2022-05-02 22 514d 2022-04-10 +1d
Scheduled
2020-10-12 2020-11-13 33 386d 2020-10-11 +1d
Scram # 54287
2019-09-22 2019-09-22 1 143d - -
Scheduled
2019-04-08 2019-05-02 25 512d 2019-04-07 +1d
Scheduled
2017-10-16 2017-11-12 28 487d 2017-10-23 -7d
Unscheduled
2016-06-16 2016-06-16 1 38d - -
Scheduled
2016-04-11 2016-05-09 29 151d 2016-04-10 +1d
Unscheduled
2015-11-08 2015-11-12 5 327d - -
Unscheduled
2014-12-14 2014-12-16 3 27d - -
Scheduled
2014-10-15 2014-11-17 34 274d 2014-10-19 -4d
Unscheduled
2014-01-12 2014-01-14 3 250d - -
Scheduled
2013-04-15 2013-05-07 23 524d 2013-04-14 +1d
Scheduled
2011-10-10 2011-11-08 30 235d 2011-10-09 +1d
Unscheduled
2011-02-13 2011-02-17 5 266d - -
Unscheduled
2010-05-23 2010-05-23 1 7d - -
Scheduled
2010-04-05 2010-05-16 42 148d 2010-04-03 +2d
Unscheduled
2009-11-06 2009-11-08 3 222d - -
Unscheduled
2009-03-23 2009-03-29 7 122d - -
Scheduled
2008-10-20 2008-11-21 33 381d 2008-10-19 +1d
Unscheduled
2007-10-04 2007-10-05 2 138d - -
Scheduled
2007-04-09 2007-05-19 41 494d 2007-04-09 0d
Scheduled
2005-10-15 2005-12-01 48 548d 2005-10-15 0d
Scheduled
2004-03-13 2004-04-15 34 123d 2004-03-12 +1d
Unscheduled
2003-11-11 2003-11-11 1 381d - -
Scheduled
2002-09-14 2002-10-26 43 447d 2002-09-14 0d
Unscheduled
2001-06-24 2001-06-24 1 48d - -
Scheduled SGR/Major
2001-02-24 2001-05-07 73 99d 2001-02-24 0d
Unscheduled
2000-11-16 2000-11-17 2 339d - -
Scheduled
1999-10-16 1999-12-13 59 123d 1999-10-16 0d
Unscheduled
1999-06-13 1999-06-15 3 - - -
Page created in 0.091 seconds with 7 queries.