NukeWorker Menu

The World Really Could Go Nuclear

Started by Ksheed, Sep 14, 2015, 02:02

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ksheed

QuoteIn just two decades Sweden went from burning oil to generate electricity to fissioning uranium. And if the world as a whole were to follow that example, all fossil fuel–fired power plants could be replaced with nuclear facilities in a little over 30 years. That's the conclusion of a new nuclear grand plan published May 13 in PLoS One.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/the-world-really-could-go-nuclear/

SloGlo

These factors suggest that while a worldwide effort to follow Sweden's nuclear example is possible—it's not probable. "As long as people, nations put fear of nuclear accidents above fear of climate change, those trends are unlikely to change," Brook adds. But "no renewable energy technology or energy efficiency approach has ever been implemented on a scale or pace required."
quando omni flunkus moritati

dubble eye, dubble yew, dubble aye!

dew the best ya kin, wit watt ya have, ware yinze are!

Ksheed

Quote from: SloGlo on Sep 14, 2015, 08:44
These factors suggest that while a worldwide effort to follow Sweden’s nuclear example is possible—it’s not probable. "As long as people, nations put fear of nuclear accidents above fear of climate change, those trends are unlikely to change," Brook adds. But "no renewable energy technology or energy efficiency approach has ever been implemented on a scale or pace required."

Yes, the key word in the article and the title is could, we are all acutely aware of the unlikeliness of this happening.