How to Streamline Nuclear Approvals While Preserving Independent Safety Review

[Marlin]

How to Streamline Nuclear Approvals While Preserving Independent Safety Review

https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/how-to-streamline-nuclear-approvals-while-preserving-independent-safety-review/

[Core Content]

Researchers at Columbia University's Center on Global Energy Policy propose granting the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards the discretion to select which applications to review. The policy analysis suggests moving away from mandatory automatic reviews for all nuclear applications to help streamline the regulatory process.

Modifying the committee's statutory obligations could prevent resource strain as smaller, standardized reactor designs potentially increase application volume. While the Nuclear Regulatory Commission now maintains a permanent technical staff to handle primary safety evaluations, experts emphasize that selective screening would preserve independent oversight for novel or complex technological issues.

Get the latest as our experts share their insights on global energy policy.

_This Energy Explained post represents the research and views of the author(s). It does not necessarily represent the views of the Center on Global Energy Policy. The piece may be subject to further revision._ _Contributions to SIPA for the benefit of CGEP are general use gifts, which gives the Center discretion in how it allocates these funds. More information is availablehere. Rare cases of sponsored projects are clearly indicated._

Read the full article at energypolicy.columbia.edu:
https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/how-to-streamline-nuclear-approvals-while-preserving-independent-safety-review/