NukeWorker Logo
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Logo
NukeWorker Menu
Main Menu

unions

Started by kolindawsey, Oct 21, 2015, 07:26

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

kolindawsey

Oct 21, 2015, 07:26
Does anyone know why there isn't a union set up specifically for "nukeworkers" or some variation there off?  For instance, why do rad techs get lumped in with IBEW, Operating Engineers, Steel Workers etc?

GLW

#1
Oct 21, 2015, 07:45
Quote from: kolindawsey on Oct 21, 2015, 07:26
.............For instance, why do rad techs get lumped in.............

easy,...



read these threads,...

https://www.nukeworker.com/forum/index.php/topic,26030.0.html

https://www.nukeworker.com/forum/index.php/topic,18812.0.html

it should only take a couple hours to figure it out,...

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"

Marlin

#2
Oct 21, 2015, 08:25
Does herding cats sound familiar. :P It has been attempted several times only craft have a base well enough defined and numerous enough to make it practical.

Mounder

#3
Oct 21, 2015, 08:28
Maybe Canada! [pigfly]

SloGlo

#4
Oct 22, 2015, 07:38
watts moor the question is why haven't more union sites mandated union membership, if it means joining their union?
quando omni flunkus moritati

dubble eye, dubble yew, dubble aye!

dew the best ya kin, wit watt ya have, ware yinze are!

Mounder

#5
Oct 22, 2015, 07:35
DOE Portsmouth is a nice test case.  It been up for vote a couple times recently and almost passed.  Now with ATL chopping benefits to nothing, the issue for rad techs is supposedly back on the table.  That said, it's always with the steelworkers local.
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions