Help | Contact Us
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Menu Addicted to Los Alamos  

Author Topic: Addicted to Los Alamos  (Read 3766 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Marlin

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 18978
  • Karma: 5147
  • Gender: Male
  • Stop Global Whining!!!

Offline hamsamich

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 1456
  • Karma: 1358
  • Gender: Male
  • And did I hear a 9er in there?
Re: Addicted to Los Alamos
« Reply #1 on: Feb 19, 2016, 12:26 »
I was wondering why they kept calling me for jobs.

Offline Mounder

  • Very Heavy User
  • *****
  • Posts: 587
  • Karma: 27
  • Gender: Male
  • Tell Recruiters to use NukeWorker.com
Re: Addicted to Los Alamos
« Reply #2 on: Feb 19, 2016, 07:18 »
The title mislead me. I thought it would be "Addicted to the shear beauty of Los Alamos and northern New Mexico.  Instead, it's a anti-nuclear piece slamming DOE contractors. The present team is really the first team to run the site. UC ran it pretty freely for 60 years.  I would expect a new administration to have some hiccups trying to change the culture.  It's probably a tough site to run since you went from heavy R&D to picking up a big chunk of the production side when they downsized the complex. It's not like Oak Ridge where you have different teams running the Lab and Y-12.

Offline GLW

  • Gold Member
  • *
  • Posts: 5503
  • Karma: 2525
  • caveo proditor,...
Re: Addicted to Los Alamos
« Reply #3 on: Feb 19, 2016, 07:32 »
The title mislead me. I thought it would be "Addicted to the shear beauty of Los Alamos and northern New Mexico. .....

true that,... +K +K +K +K +K +K +K +K +K +K 8)

been there, dun that,... the doormat to hell does not read "welcome", the doormat to hell reads "it's just business"

Offline Marlin

  • Forum Staff
  • *
  • Posts: 18978
  • Karma: 5147
  • Gender: Male
  • Stop Global Whining!!!
Re: Addicted to Los Alamos
« Reply #4 on: Feb 19, 2016, 09:17 »
The title mislead me. I thought it would be "Addicted to the shear beauty of Los Alamos and northern New Mexico.  Instead, it's a anti-nuclear piece slamming DOE contractors. The present team is really the first team to run the site. UC ran it pretty freely for 60 years.  I would expect a new administration to have some hiccups trying to change the culture.  It's probably a tough site to run since you went from heavy R&D to picking up a big chunk of the production side when they downsized the complex. It's not like Oak Ridge where you have different teams running the Lab and Y-12.

Yeah it was anti, but not so sure it was anti-nuclear as much as it was anti-waste. It looks like Los Alamos will get most of the funding. It's not like you can order one of the "pit's" from Amazon when you need one ;) and they are perishable.

 [coffee]

 


NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2025 All rights reserved.
All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.
Privacy Statement | Terms of Use | Code of Conduct | Spam Policy | Advertising Info | Contact Us | Forum Rules | Password Problem?