0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
How does this test differ from NRRPT? And it sounds like you could get rid of the DOE core test and replace it with NANTEL. Fundamentals are the same everywhere. You could then emphasise site specifics.
In addition to all that, comparing the NUF to the NRRPT brings to mind Broadzilla's 'Navy Sub as Start-up Source' analogy.
I'm suprised you didnt link to your source. Man, the standards on this site are so low.
I was overwhelmed... there were just too many links to reference...
Previous post referenced the nantel rp fundamental exam. I am not familiar with this. I am familiar with nuc, nrrpt and doe core. Who is associated with who is irrelevant to my point: the need for a minimum rp standard acceptable at all nuke sites and revalidated on a routine basis. The sites could then spend more time on site specifics.But it wouldnt really save you or the plant much time, just one test.And were would you take it and how would you insure it was on the up and up? INPO is beginning to have a presence in the doe world.Sometimes its like quest for fire. You go out looking for flame and you discover an advanced tribe and a whole new world.Whats the start up analogy?
I just did a search on BING for NANTeL Training and the first hit was this thread.
Watch it bucko! You are talking about ending the careers of hundreds of trainers at DOE and other sites across the fruited plain. I mean we're talking real wrath of god type stuff! Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and seas boiling! Forty years of darkness, earthquakes, and volcanos! The dead rising from the grave! Human sacrifices, dogs and cats living together! Mass hysteria!
Page created in 0.057 seconds with 76 queries.