Sequoyah 2 vs Vogtle 1

Side-by-side Operational Excellence breakdown across 7 publicly observable performance dimensions.

Comparing Vogtle 1 and Sequoyah 2. Vogtle 1 leads on the composite score (51/100, Mid Quartile), 18 points ahead of Sequoyah 2. Vogtle 1 takes Reliability (47). Vogtle 1 takes Efficiency (76). Sequoyah 2 takes Discipline (47).

Sequoyah 2

Tennessee Valley Authority · TN · PWR
33/100
Bottom Quartile · #75/93
Reliability
20
Efficiency
30
Discipline
47

Vogtle 1

Southern Nuclear · GA · PWR
51/100
Mid Quartile · #39/93
Reliability
47
Efficiency
76
Discipline
29

7-Dimension Radar Each axis = percentile rank in the active US fleet (higher = better)

Per-Dimension Percentile Breakdown

Dimension Sequoyah 2 Vogtle 1
Capacity Factor 5-year average capacity factor — total generation as a fraction of installed capacity. Higher is better; top operators sustain 92%+.
8
80.4%
53
91.9%
Forced Outage Days/yr 5-year forced outage days per year (annualised) — non-power days NOT explained by scheduled refueling. Lower is better.
15
9.4d
59
2.6d
B2B Avg Streak Average breaker-to-breaker continuous-operation days across this unit's qualifying B2B runs (lifetime). Higher is better; reflects sustained reliability.
39
510d
30
506d
Fuel Utilization Average in-cycle capacity factor (3-year). Fraction of each refueling cycle that produced full power. Higher = more efficient operator.
Refuel Duration 5-year median scheduled refueling outage duration in days (refuel-shaped outages, 14-90d). Lower = faster turnaround.
30
36d
76
25d
Startup Duration Robust mean days from first power post-refuel to sustained ≥95% power. Lower = faster ramp.
Scrams (5-year) Scrams per year, computed over the 5-year window (annualised so windows are comparable). Lower is better; reflects operating discipline and equipment reliability.
47
0.4/yr
29
0.6/yr