NukeWorker Logo
NukeWorker.com
NukeWorker Logo
NukeWorker Menu

Employers

Employer Login Help & FAQ Prices Testimonials Info Kit Resume Summary Post Jobs Search Resumes Create AccountCreate Employer Account

Job Seekers

Jobseeker Login Post Resume Search Jobs Create AccountCreate JobSeeker Account

Study & Quiz

Study Guides Practice Tests

Outages

Outage Schedules Live Tracker Current Season Next Season Next 18 Months Next 24 Months Historical Data Analyst Archive

Advertising

Banner Ads Lodging Post Jobs Info Kit

Other Services

Gold Member Upload Picture View Pictures Calendar Help Search for User

Fleet Rankings

Which US nuclear operator runs the best fleet? Composite of 7 publicly observable performance metrics, aggregated by owner. Data refreshed 7.2h ago

20
Operators Ranked
94 active units total
70
Top Fleet
Constellation Energy · 21 units
26
Bottom Fleet
DTE Energy · 1 units
Compare any 4 units
Side-by-Side Tool
Open comparison →
Fleet size: All 20 Mega-fleet (8+) Mid (3–7) Small (1–2) Showing 20 of 20 operators

Operator Fleet Excellence Leaderboard Click any row to expand the unit-level breakdown

# Operator Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Units Top Q Bottom Q Best Worst
1 Constellation Energy Top Quartile 70 77 71 62 21 76% 0% Peach Bottom 3 89 Clinton 42

Constellation Energy — 21 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Peach Bottom 3 PA 89 96 77 92 Top Quartile #2 / 94
Byron 2 IL 88 83 95 87 Top Quartile #3 / 94
Braidwood 2 IL 84 75 95 83 Top Quartile #4 / 94
LaSalle 2 IL 80 71 90 79 Top Quartile #6 / 94
Limerick 2 PA 79 79 89 70 Top Quartile #7 / 94
Calvert Cliffs 1 MD 78 69 77 87 Top Quartile #8 / 94
Byron 1 IL 77 68 90 73 Top Quartile #9 / 94
Quad Cities 1 IL 74 79 69 74 Top Quartile #10 / 94
Limerick 1 PA 73 83 70 65 Top Quartile #11 / 94
LaSalle 1 IL 72 82 70 64 Top Quartile #14 / 94
Dresden 3 IL 72 70 65 81 Top Quartile #15 / 94
FitzPatrick NY 71 94 64 56 Top Quartile #16 / 94
Dresden 2 IL 71 83 78 53 Top Quartile #17 / 94
Braidwood 1 IL 71 77 89 48 Top Quartile #18 / 94
Ginna NY 69 67 90 48 Top Quartile #22 / 94
Peach Bottom 2 PA 66 89 67 41 Top Quartile #23 / 94
Nine Mile Point 1 NY 61 88 25 70 Mid Quartile #30 / 94
Calvert Cliffs 2 MD 55 76 45 43 Mid Quartile #36 / 94
Quad Cities 2 IL 51 62 55 35 Mid Quartile #41 / 94
Nine Mile Point 2 NY 51 62 54 35 Mid Quartile #42 / 94
Clinton IL 42 58 46 24 Mid Quartile #62 / 94
2 Duke Energy Top Quartile 65 64 66 65 11 45% 0% Oconee 1 91 Brunswick 1 49

Duke Energy — 11 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Oconee 1 SC 91 93 86 95 Top Quartile #1 / 94
Oconee 3 SC 81 79 68 94 Top Quartile #5 / 94
Catawba 1 SC 73 57 77 85 Top Quartile #12 / 94
McGuire 1 NC 71 69 63 82 Top Quartile #19 / 94
Oconee 2 SC 65 71 63 62 Top Quartile #24 / 94
Harris 1 NC 63 60 78 53 Mid Quartile #27 / 94
Brunswick 2 NC 62 80 58 48 Mid Quartile #29 / 94
Catawba 2 SC 55 40 69 55 Mid Quartile #35 / 94
McGuire 2 NC 54 46 65 52 Mid Quartile #38 / 94
Robinson 2 SC 50 54 46 49 Mid Quartile #48 / 94
Brunswick 1 NC 49 55 51 42 Mid Quartile #49 / 94
3 NextEra Energy Top Quartile 53 48 60 51 7 29% 14% Point Beach 1 72 Turkey Point 3 32

NextEra Energy — 7 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Point Beach 1 WI 72 72 88 56 Top Quartile #13 / 94
Point Beach 2 WI 70 63 85 64 Top Quartile #20 / 94
Turkey Point 4 FL 51 52 54 46 Mid Quartile #43 / 94
Seabrook 1 NH 50 46 50 54 Mid Quartile #46 / 94
Saint Lucie 1 FL 47 40 51 50 Mid Quartile #53 / 94
Saint Lucie 2 FL 45 35 37 64 Mid Quartile #59 / 94
Turkey Point 3 FL 32 25 53 19 Bottom Quartile #77 / 94
4 STP Nuclear Operating Top Quartile 50 45 52 54 2 0% 0% South Texas 2 58 South Texas 1 42

STP Nuclear Operating — 2 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
South Texas 2 TX 58 53 63 60 Mid Quartile #33 / 94
South Texas 1 TX 42 38 41 48 Mid Quartile #64 / 94
5 Vistra Corp. Top Quartile 48 49 50 46 6 0% 17% Davis-Besse 65 Perry 1 22

Vistra Corp. — 6 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Davis-Besse OH 65 51 62 84 Mid Quartile #25 / 94
Comanche Peak 1 TX 55 58 54 53 Mid Quartile #34 / 94
Beaver Valley 2 PA 55 53 67 44 Mid Quartile #37 / 94
Comanche Peak 2 TX 48 54 59 31 Mid Quartile #50 / 94
Beaver Valley 1 PA 43 45 50 35 Mid Quartile #60 / 94
Perry 1 OH 22 32 7 28 Bottom Quartile #88 / 94
6 Arizona Public Service Mid Quartile 48 42 48 55 3 0% 33% Palo Verde 1 61 Palo Verde 2 32

Arizona Public Service — 3 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Palo Verde 1 AZ 61 61 53 69 Mid Quartile #31 / 94
Palo Verde 3 AZ 51 40 54 58 Mid Quartile #44 / 94
Palo Verde 2 AZ 32 24 36 37 Bottom Quartile #78 / 94
7 PSEG Nuclear Mid Quartile 48 47 42 54 3 0% 33% Salem 1 61 Hope Creek 1 31

PSEG Nuclear — 3 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Salem 1 NJ 61 60 48 75 Mid Quartile #32 / 94
Salem 2 NJ 51 51 52 49 Mid Quartile #45 / 94
Hope Creek 1 NJ 31 29 26 38 Bottom Quartile #79 / 94
8 Nebraska Public Power District Mid Quartile 46 79 23 34 1 0% 0% Cooper 46 Cooper 46

Nebraska Public Power District — 1 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Cooper NE 46 79 23 34 Mid Quartile #57 / 94
9 Dominion Energy Mid Quartile 45 32 38 66 7 0% 29% Surry 2 64 Summer 19

Dominion Energy — 7 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Surry 2 VA 64 50 52 90 Mid Quartile #26 / 94
Millstone 2 CT 63 40 57 93 Mid Quartile #28 / 94
North Anna 2 VA 46 31 28 80 Mid Quartile #55 / 94
North Anna 1 VA 46 37 61 40 Mid Quartile #56 / 94
Surry 1 VA 46 27 48 62 Mid Quartile #58 / 94
Millstone 3 CT 35 28 9 66 Bottom Quartile #72 / 94
Summer SC 19 11 14 31 Bottom Quartile #89 / 94
10 Pacific Gas & Electric Mid Quartile 45 53 33 49 2 0% 0% Diablo Canyon 1 48 Diablo Canyon 2 43

Pacific Gas & Electric — 2 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Diablo Canyon 1 CA 48 62 36 46 Mid Quartile #52 / 94
Diablo Canyon 2 CA 43 45 31 52 Mid Quartile #61 / 94
11 Southern Nuclear Mid Quartile 41 36 51 36 8 13% 25% Vogtle 2 70 Vogtle 3 15

Southern Nuclear — 8 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Vogtle 2 GA 70 66 63 81 Top Quartile #21 / 94
Vogtle 1 GA 54 46 64 51 Mid Quartile #39 / 94
Vogtle 4 GA 50 17 63 70 Mid Quartile #47 / 94
Farley 1 AL 48 46 66 32 Mid Quartile #51 / 94
Farley 2 AL 37 44 44 23 Mid Quartile #69 / 94
Hatch 2 GA 36 53 35 20 Mid Quartile #70 / 94
Hatch 1 GA 18 14 30 9 Bottom Quartile #91 / 94
Vogtle 3 GA 15 3 42 1 Bottom Quartile #92 / 94
12 Wolf Creek Nuclear Mid Quartile 38 29 29 57 1 0% 0% Wolf Creek 1 38 Wolf Creek 1 38

Wolf Creek Nuclear — 1 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Wolf Creek 1 KS 38 29 29 57 Mid Quartile #68 / 94
13 Talen Energy Mid Quartile 34 54 32 17 2 0% 50% Susquehanna 2 42 Susquehanna 1 27

Talen Energy — 2 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Susquehanna 2 PA 42 67 31 29 Mid Quartile #63 / 94
Susquehanna 1 PA 27 41 34 5 Bottom Quartile #83 / 94
14 Tennessee Valley Authority Mid Quartile 33 32 35 34 7 0% 57% Browns Ferry 2 46 Watts Bar 1 24

Tennessee Valley Authority — 7 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Browns Ferry 2 Al 46 68 41 30 Mid Quartile #54 / 94
Browns Ferry 1 Al 39 44 41 32 Mid Quartile #65 / 94
Watts Bar 2 TN 39 26 65 25 Mid Quartile #66 / 94
Browns Ferry 3 Al 33 34 26 38 Bottom Quartile #75 / 94
Sequoyah 2 TN 27 10 28 44 Bottom Quartile #82 / 94
Sequoyah 1 TN 26 22 19 35 Bottom Quartile #84 / 94
Watts Bar 1 TN 24 17 22 33 Bottom Quartile #87 / 94
15 Energy Northwest Mid Quartile 33 41 21 36 1 0% 100% Columbia Generating Station 33 Columbia Generating Station 33

Energy Northwest — 1 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Columbia Generating Station WA 33 41 21 36 Bottom Quartile #76 / 94
16 Xcel Energy Bottom Quartile 32 36 31 31 3 0% 67% Prairie Island 1 38 Monticello 26

Xcel Energy — 3 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Prairie Island 1 MN 38 32 38 46 Mid Quartile #67 / 94
Prairie Island 2 MN 33 44 30 26 Bottom Quartile #74 / 94
Monticello MN 26 32 25 20 Bottom Quartile #85 / 94
17 Indiana Michigan Power Bottom Quartile 32 33 35 29 2 0% 50% D.C. Cook 1 36 D.C. Cook 2 29

Indiana Michigan Power — 2 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
D.C. Cook 1 MI 36 41 28 38 Mid Quartile #71 / 94
D.C. Cook 2 MI 29 24 41 20 Bottom Quartile #80 / 94
18 Ameren Missouri Bottom Quartile 28 4 22 58 1 0% 100% Callaway 28 Callaway 28

Ameren Missouri — 1 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Callaway MO 28 4 22 58 Bottom Quartile #81 / 94
19 Entergy Bottom Quartile 26 31 17 30 5 0% 80% Arkansas Nuclear 2 54 Grand Gulf 1 11

Entergy — 5 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Arkansas Nuclear 2 AR 54 42 42 77 Mid Quartile #40 / 94
Arkansas Nuclear 1 AR 34 30 28 45 Bottom Quartile #73 / 94
River Bend 1 LA 18 36 8 10 Bottom Quartile #90 / 94
Waterford 3 LA 12 19 1 14 Bottom Quartile #93 / 94
Grand Gulf 1 MS 11 28 4 2 Bottom Quartile #94 / 94
20 DTE Energy Bottom Quartile 26 38 13 25 1 0% 100% Fermi 2 26 Fermi 2 26

DTE Energy — 1 active units

Unit State Composite Reliability Efficiency Discipline Quartile Fleet Rank
Fermi 2 MI 26 38 13 25 Bottom Quartile #86 / 94
Want to compare specific units head-to-head? Open the unit comparison tool →

How fleet rankings are computed

NukeWorker's Operational Excellence Score ranks every active US nuclear unit on a 0–100 composite of seven publicly observable performance metrics. This page rolls those unit scores up to the operator level so you can see which company runs the best fleet.

Aggregation: Each operator's fleet score is the simple unweighted average of its scored units' composites and sub-scores. We use unweighted averaging (rather than MWe-weighted) because this is meant to reward consistency across the fleet — a single weak performer drags an operator down regardless of nameplate, which is what an "operator excellence" metric should measure.

  • Composite — average of the unit composites in the fleet.
  • Top Q / Bottom Q — share of the operator's units that fall in the top and bottom INPO-style quartiles of the full fleet.
  • Best / Worst — the operator's highest- and lowest-scoring individual units.
  • Provisional units (e.g. Vogtle 4) and decommissioned units are excluded from the operator's average.

Fleet-size buckets: mega-fleet (8+ units), mid (3–7), small (1–2). Use the pills above to compare like-sized operators.

Refreshes daily. See the unit-level Operator Efficiency Leaderboard →

NukeWorker ™ is a registered trademark of NukeWorker.com ™, LLC © 1996-2026 All rights reserved.

This page was last updated on Sunday, the 10th of May, 2026. How's that for fresh?

All material on this Web Site, including text, photographs, graphics, code and/or software, are protected by international copyright/trademark laws and treaties. Unauthorized use is not permitted. You may not modify, copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit or distribute, in any manner, the material on this web site or any portion of it. Doing so will result in severe civil and criminal penalties, and will be prosecuted to the maximum extent possible under the law.